Monday, March 31, 2008

Humour at work, Workopolis

Workopolis' Humour Classification Report:

This year Workopolis provides information about who is doing the joking
and how to do humour right this April Fool's Day.

- Sarcastic/witty jokester: This workplace comedian may appear to have
it easy with a punch line for every situation, but humour isn't
always the right solution. While it tends comes across as witty and
clever, if done too often or gone wrong, his humour can be perceived
as sarcastic. He isn't shy to add colour commentary in any and all
situations - in front of the boss, colleagues or whomever. And
because of the witty approach to his humour, he is confident in his
delivery and always gets a laugh.

- Workopolis' advice: Think before you joke. Evaluate the situation,
your audience and your injection of humour. Will it get a laugh
from most of the room? Will it take the meeting off strategy? Are
you interrupting and offending anyone? Keeping quiet could be the
best approach in serious situations, meetings or environments.

- Obnoxious or inappropriate joker: She's easy to identify since there
is often an uncomfortable silence that follows her humour. And she
doesn't hesitate to incorporate her humour into any situation. She
has a hard time differentiating between workplace humour and social
humour and often crosses the line with inappropriate language and
subject matters. Don't follow her lead this April Fool's Day!

- Workopolis' advice: You are still at work, and what may get a
laugh with your friends, isn't always appropriate with your
colleagues. Avoid topics that really don't lend themselves to
humour - anything you'd be afraid to say to your mother, doesn't
belong in the workplace either. Evaluate each situation and assess
the room before you open with a punch line. Your colleagues will
appreciate your humour more if you use it cautiously.

- Trying too hard to be funny jokester: He's often relying on humour to
get attention and lighten uncomfortable situations. He rarely hears
the laugh track after his punch line, but that only pushes him to try
harder. His comments and attempts at humour distract the audience
more than amuse. According to the Workopolis April Fool's Day poll,
only two per cent of Canadians believe humour should be used at work
to get attention or stand out from others. That means this approach
to workplace humour is in the minority and more people are
uncomfortable with your humour than approve.

- Workopolis' advice: You don't have to have the last word, and you
certainly don't need to make a comment every time you're in the
room. The more you say, the less funny you are, and the fewer
laughs you'll get. Try other techniques to earn respect from your
colleagues and save your humour for the right or best situation.
In this case, less is more.

- The Prankster: This joker often relies on physical practical jokes to
get a reaction from his colleagues. He is clever in his approach and
aims to trick people - whether turning to email sabotage, rearranging
office furniture, whoopee cushions or crank phone calls. Be weary of
this workplace comic.

- Workopolis' advice: April Fool's Day was made for you! Be sure you
know your audience well and understand the limitations of
workplace pranks. Before your prank, do your research and find out
if it's acceptable to pull a practical joke on the boss. Often
your humour involves tricking people one at a time, so make sure
your victims can handle your sense of humour.

- Putting it all on the line funny: This prankster goes a step beyond
"Trying too hard to be funny". She stops at nothing to get a laugh -
even at the expense of her career or colleagues. She often spends
more time crafting the right prank instead of focusing on her work.
She's willing to embarrass herself in front of room full of
colleagues to get attention. April Fool's Day is a dangerous day for
this workplace clown as she feels it's a no holds barred-type of day.

- Workopolis' advice: Re-evaluate your career - maybe you were more
suited for the life of a comedian? While work environments are
finding more room for humour, not all corporate cultures tolerate
yours. Understand what's acceptable and appropriate in your work
environment before you go too far. Tone it down and save up more
of your humour and pranks for outside of work social situations.

The rules of humour at work:

While each work environment has its own specific approach to humour and
pranks on the job, workopolis.com offers the following advice to those
planning a prank this April Fool's Day or any day of the year:

- Know your corporate culture: While there may not be a formal rule in
place, do your research first and find out how tolerant your
workplace is of practical jokes. If it's not widely accepted,
reconsider your plans for April 1st. If it is allowed, know your
boundaries.

- Know who's off limits: Though half of working Canadians report their
workplaces allow pranks, does that include the boss? Your manager?
Your subordinates? Recognize who has a sense of humour, who will
appreciate your humour and who you should avoid.

- Know how far you can go: It may be just a joke, but more importantly,
you're still at work and should use cautious judgement before you go
too far. Ask yourself if the prank was played on you, would you find
it funny? Can this prank only be tested on certain colleagues? If the
answer to either of these questions is no, reconsider your practical
joke.

- Know when the timing is right: Even if you work for an environment
that encourages humour and pranks, there is a time and a place for
everything. Consider: are your colleagues on deadline? Are there
clients or important guests in your office? Is it too tense and a
practical joke will push them over the edge? What kind of a message
will you send if it's your first day of work and you're the
originator of a workplace prank?

- Know what to do if you've gone too far: You may take every necessary
precaution to ensure humour is used appropriately at work, but it can
still backfire. First, find out where you went wrong - was the timing
off? Did you target the wrong person? If you offended someone
specifically, formally apologize.

Labels:

Wednesday, March 26, 2008

"Just" for "J" Week

Well, lucky for me that Seth Godin blogged about writing this week and gave me my inspiration. Here is his full post:

Sort of, just and Donald Trump

I noticed a little while ago that I was using the word "just" and the phrase "sort of" in my writing. All the time, in fact. In my last book, a search and replace removed more than 80 unnecessary 'justs'.

Just say it.

Don't hide behind waffling terms that don't mean anything.

On the other hand, as I passed the skating rink in New York with the Donald's name plastered all over it, I'm reminded of a new trend I'm seeing more of, which is the act of declaring whatever you're working on 'the best ever,' 'the best in the world,' etc.

Saying it doesn't make it so. In fact, it probably makes it unso.


Take the advice and cut out those extra words. Not just the waffling words but the insistent words like "very" as in "It was a very long time since he had called".

In fact, you should be able to go through your writing and cut it by at least 10%. When I edit the work of wordy professionals like lawyers, bureaucrats, and academics, I set myself a goal of reducing the word count by 30%.

Labels: , , ,

Sunday, March 23, 2008

"I" Is for Impact

I missed doing the ABCs Wednesday posting because I was in Thunder Bay Ontario, engaged in a two-day training session. But here comes the "I" for impact.

The Nishnawbe-Aski Police Services invited the Literacy and Policing project to deliver our program on how low literacy, amongst victims, witnesses, and accused persons, impacts the criminal justice system.

This is an awareness program. But our own awareness was certainly raised by a video we viewed during preparation for the visit.

The Nishnawbe-Aski Police Service is 10 years old. I discovered in person that this police service is composed of informed, educated, well-trained people who care deeply about their work in community policing. They certainly taught us more than we were able to share with them.

Nishnawbe-Aski Police Service: A Sacred Calling is an 18 minute documentary short film portraying the deplorable working and living conditions of NAPS officers and detachments, resulting from an accumulation of severe provincial and federal funding shortages.

View the documentary from Nishnawbe Aski Nation web site. You will never regret having given your time.

Addition:
A nice bit of news coverage for our project: http://www.chroniclejournal.com/stories_local.php?id=99325

Sunday, March 16, 2008

Blogging and Meetings. What is the connect?

Blogging as a phenomena is old enough to have developed its own rules of behaviour.

Well, it is nice that some standards have developed, but I am not happy about all the expectations.

Let me digress.

About 10 years ago, I offered to help out a committee of a professional association I belonged to at the time. I said, I volunteer to do anything at all that you need done but do not ask me to attend meetings. Of course, I was asked to attend meetings. First it was about working out what needed to be done. But thereafter meeting attendance was an expectation of volunteering.

Everybody hates meetings. I researched this and prepared a workshop on how to have effective meetings. So I find it difficult to sit through a meeting that is dawdling, dragging, or imploding. Don't ask me to be there.

Back to blogging. I want to support other bloggers that I enjoy reading. But do not ask me to do the memes, the lists of 5 things that blah-blah, and so on. Do not ask me to take up your theme for the month.

Appreciate the fact that I am a subscriber and that I read you everyday--whether you know that or not.

So, for the record, I don't like the fact that you are not considered a member of the blogging community if you do not play along and meet the expectations of other bloggers. I am just trying to meet the needs of my own readers.

Labels: ,

Friday, March 14, 2008

Haiku for the Week of "H"

A little poetry and a picture for your week-end enjoyment.

Wednesday, March 12, 2008

Wednesday ABCs: Higher Order Concerns

Purdue University's Online Writing Lab offers a list of Higher Order Concerns to guide your writing work. These concerns resemble a list of plain language guidelines. They certainly help put into perspective the lower order concerns.

Monday, March 10, 2008

Basic Techniques for Building Rapport

Dummies UK site (click on title) provides the article below, adapted from the book, Neurolinguistics for Dummies.

Seven quick ways to sharpen your rapport

For starters, try some immediate ways to begin building rapport:

* Take a genuine interest in getting to know what's important to the other person. Start to understand them rather than expecting them to understand you first.
* Pick up on the key words, favourite phrases and way of speaking that someone uses and build these subtly into your own conversation.
* Notice how someone likes to handle information. Do they like lots of details or just the big picture? As you speak, feed back information in this same portion size.
* Breathe in unison with them.
* Look out for the other person's intention — their underlying aim — rather than what they do or say. They may not always get it right, but expect their heart to lie in the right place.
* Adopt a similar stance to them in terms of your body language, gestures, voice tone and speed.
* Respect the other person's time, energy, favourite people and money. They will be important resources for them.

Labels: , , , , ,

Wednesday, March 05, 2008

"G" is for Grammar

Wonderful coincidence: My "G" day is also U.S. National Grammar Day!

Stuart Froman argues at In Search Of in favor of a National Clarity Day:

"Perfect grammar—whether written or spoken—never solves a problem (except the problem of imperfect grammar ). It doesn’t make a person more creative or a better thinker. It can’t turn a bad idea into a good one, or an unclear thought into a clear one. It doesn’t guarantee that we will be understood."

Sunday, March 02, 2008

More for "F" Week

from the blog
The Party of the First Part
Word of the Week

By Adam Freedman

Fighting Words Doctrine

The First Amendment doctrine that holds that certain utterances are not constitutionally protected as free speech if they are "inherently likely to provoke a violent response from the audience" (Black's). Besides which, it's horrible manners.